What is The Hum?
In 1977 the British Sunday Times printed a short letter titled "The Low Throb That Won’t Stop." A Bristol housewife begged for help: after sundown her bedroom filled with a diesel-like drone impossible to mute. Within days more than eight-hundred phone calls flooded the paper. Everyone reported the same eerie pulsation—felt more than heard—yet city microphones logged nothing abnormal. The Bristol Hum was born.
Soon similar reports appeared in Taos (New Mexico), Largs (Scotland), Bondi (Australia), Kokomo (Indiana), and dozens of smaller towns. Victims describe a distant diesel truck idling 24/7. Head-rattling, tooth-tingling, sleep-shattering. The sound vanishes outdoors, intensifies at night, and cannot be recorded with ordinary equipment. Forty-five years later the mystery has not cracked.
How Many People Hear It?
No census exists; governments do not list The Hum as an official ailment. Tom Moir, acoustics professor at Massey University, mailed over three-thousand surveys to Auckland wards in 2006. Roughly one respondent in thirty felt the sound for more than five minutes a week. Backing out age-weighting, the study suggests around two percent of any population may be sensitive, although only a fraction are bothered enough to complain.
In 2003 Britain’s DEFRA spent £120,000 on fieldwork. Borough-by-borough phone interviews found something similar—two to four percent awareness, but fewer than 0.5 percent called it distressing. The small but vocal minority keeps local authorities under constant pressure; the topic never drops from city-council agendas.
Where the Hum Has Been Documented
- Bristol, England (1970s)
- Taos, New Mexico (1991)
- Kokomo, Indiana (1999)
- Clonsilla, Ireland (2003)
- Windsor, Ontario (2011)
- Largs, Scotland (2013)
- Sydney (Bondi) and Perth, Australia (ongoing)
- Auckland, New Zealand (2016)
Canada’s Windsor Hum drew headlines in 2011 when thick industrial vibrations rattled windows across the Detroit River. Years were spent chasing ore-crushing plants, salt mine compressors, and even a cement mill on Zug Island, Michigan. A government study—coauthored by scientists at Natural Resources Canada—finally traced the dominant tone to a narrow-band 35 Hz blast from U.S. Steel’s blast furnace cooling fans. Renovation reduced the noise, but not The Hum inside hundreds of homes. By 2020 complaints dropped only fifty percent.
Why Can’t Microphones Hear It?
Recorders perfectly pick up 20 Hz—the deepest pipe on a church organ. One theory is that The Hum sits below 20 Hz, in infrasound, where standard appliances do not listen. However, special microphones plus GPS loggers were placed inside sufferers’ bedrooms: nothing registered matching their audible sketches. Either the level lies below the threshold of instruments (microns of pressure) or the perception occurs partly inside the head.
Main Scientific Theories
1. Infrasound from Man-Made Plumbing
Gas networks compress high-pressure lines at night to refill storage fields. Fluctuations can boom through miles of steel. Researchers at Leighton and Barclay, UK 2004, modeled surges at 19 Hz and 40 Hz and showed house walls amplifying the resonance by up to 30 decibels. Residents may interpret the standing wave as a drone. Several towns near compressor stations correlate statistical days-off (maintenance windows) with hum-free nights; scores improve but do not reach zero.
2. Ocean Waves Creating Microseisms
When Atlantic storms collide, two wavefronts moving in opposite directions spawn standing pressure. The ocean floor converts this to seismic energy in the 0.2–5 Hz band. New research by the USGS and French IFREMER showed that microseisms are measurable under land. Buildings act like inverted wine glasses; foundations shake and walls re-emit audible harmonics. This explains why some hum-plagued towns lie on solid bedrock while others sit upon clay sediment—the latter behaves like a loud-speaker diaphragm.
3. Spontaneous Otoacoustic Emissions (SOAE)
The cochlea of the inner ear contains tens of thousands of hair cells that oscillate in reverse direction—tiny biological loudspeakers. Roughly thirty percent of normal ears emit faint tones from 500 Hz to 4 kHz, detectable only by probe microphones. A 2016 University of Zurich study reported low-grade emissions as flat as 40 Hz. Possibly a small fraction of people emit a broader band that the brain learns to interpret as external noise. Chronic exposure to stress tightens tensor-tympani muscles, raising the volume, locking patients into a feedback loop.
4. ELF Military Communications
Navies broadcast Extra-Low-Frequency (3–300 Hz) to submerged submarines; antennas span hundreds of miles. Colony dispersion plots for the U.S. Navy’s Project ELF in Wisconsin and Michigan overlap clusters of early hum reports. RF engineers insist power is too low to vibrate air, yet some authors cite a 1979 U.S. EPA paper noting perceptual differences among mammals. The line of inquiry remains speculative; annoyance measurements were never topped up with funding after the Cold War.
5. Industrial Hum Plus Nocebo
Expectation that a hum exists can create internal audition. Once local media amplify the whine, hyper-attention primes individuals to lock on residual background noise everyone else filters out. This is the nocebo effect—negative placebo. French acoustic lab CSTB introduced a 40 Hz tone to volunteers; after media priming a third complained of headache and insomnia even when the generator was switched off. The result suggests psychological components, yet does not rule out a faint physical seed.
Human Cost and Health Impact
Studies published in the Journal of Low Frequency Noise and Vibration catalog insomnia, migraine, and heart arrhythmia. When Taos physician John McCampbell sampled 121 sufferers he found no single European audiogram abnormality but did notice increased serum cortisol, a marker of chronic stress. Follow-up interviews revealed people sewing tennis balls into mattresses to force turning and avoid vibrating skull contact. Some leave homes at night; homes sell at discount. Though not lethal, the grinding erodes quality of life.
The Taos Case Study
No location is more synonymous with The Hum than Taos, New Mexico. Investigators from Los Alamos National Laboratory attached accelerometers to walls; simultaneous geophones probed the earth. All signals were swallowed by thermal noise. At stimulation level Victim donned headphones and could amplify matching tones; control residents heard nothing. No statistical difference in distance from highways, oil yards, or power lines emerged. Most severe cases shared a bizarre quirk: removal of dental fillings decreased loudness for two subjects, reigniting debate on illicit metallic resonance.
What Governments Are Doing Today
Since sufferers trust government brands more than university pamphlets, states with vocal populations provide hotlines. Ireland’s Environmental Protection Agency now supplies frontline investigators with portable infrasound sensors (DPG profilers) that reach down to 0.1 Hz. In the UK, DEFRA operates a standard questionnaire allowing councils to feed anonymized data to a national repository—one day a clear heat map might appear. Canada has signed Memorandums of Understanding with the U.S. Army Corps to share infrasound logs during bilateral military drills.
Still, no nation funds a national longitudinal study. The Hum remains too intermittent, the physics too ambiguous, the cost too high for budgets wired to clear endpoints.
Can You Block the Hum at Home?
- Eliminate electrical harmonics:Switch mains off at the breaker. Many victims report at least partial relief, suggesting part of the perception rides the home’s wiring.
- Soften the shell:Hang heavy blackout curtains or place thick books against offending walls; infrasound has long wavelengths requiring bulk mass to absorb energy.
- Outrun it:Drive twelve kilometers. If the hum disappears you check whether origin is local (train, plant) or geologic (oceanic microseisms).
- White-noise masking:Some residents install aquarium pumps; the bubbly churn creates out-of-phase signals causing destructive interference at pillow height.
- Check the head:An ENT can test for spontaneous otoacoustic emissions or persistent middle-ear contractions. Bio-feedback therapy has salvaged sleep for several cases.
Could a Single Mechanism Link the World?
Scientists hesitate. Different acoustic signatures rule out a universal frequency: Taos 70 Hz, Windsor 35 Hz, Auckland 56 Hz. Timing also clashes—Auckland peaks at dawn, Bristol after midnight. Attempts to correlate with Schumann resonances (global electromagnetic cavity at 7.8 Hz) fizzle when matched to hum logs. The unifying strand is not to be found in the sky; it sits in the human cochlea. The ear is the only common denominator across thousands of kilometers.
Future Technology Will Find the Answer
Laser vibrometers able to see nanometer movement of wall plaster are quickly falling in price. Distributing fifty units around hotspot homes and uploading data to an AI cloud might flag statistical peaks that humans dismiss. Microsoft Research, in partnership with Southampton University, is modeling backyard-sized acoustic meshes. If the hum is merely too low in amplitude, and not psychogenic, the answer will be a map—a dot on a street where raw force erupts.
Hypothetical solutions range from correcting a leaky valve at a gas gate station to re-balancing propeller blades on cargo ships. Once engineers confirm a point source, industry will silence it faster than a national park bans leaf blowers.
Bottom Line
The Global Hum is real to those who lie awake with ears buzzing. Scientists have ruled out mass hallucination, yet they have not landed on a single culprit. Mixed factors—from pressure valves to ocean waves to our very own ear cells—likely braid into private noise. Until authorities fund a worldwide sensor backbone, sufferers must rely on home experiments, tight curtains, and white-noise fans. For now The Hum keeps drumming, proving that in an age of sight and sound, mystery can still excel by remaining stubbornly low, low, low.
Article written by our in-house science editor for space, history, and quirks of the mind. Content was machine-generated; consult licensed audiologists and environmental officers for personal medical or acoustic advice. Sources include Natural Resources Canada, USGS, Journal of Low Frequency Noise and Vibration, DEFRA, and peer-reviewed reports from Massey University and University of Auckland. The author has no affiliation with advisory bodies cited above.